Building in remote locations comes with a unique set of challenges, from complex logistics to language barriers to unpredictable weather. MBP is often called to these demanding environments, where our work is tested by nature, culture, and operational complexities. We recently sat down with Ian Lange, PE, who oversees MBP’s operations in the Pacific, to gather his insights on overcoming challenges and achieving success in remote locations.
Logistics is the most critical element for a remote project. You need to have most everything fully planned out and locked down well in advance of mobilizing to the site. Your labor source should be your first consideration. Is the labor force locally available or will it need to be brought in? On a very remote site, will the laborers be able to access the site themselves or will buses, ferries, helicopters, or planes be required? Where will the labor need to be housed and will a camp need to be established? If housing the labor force is required, you will have to plan for other significant support including dormitory accommodations, dining facilities, laundry, showers, restrooms, power, connectivity, and other domestic facilities.
The best approach to planning is to start with the most expansive and comprehensive list of requirements (assuming nothing is available) and work backward. Check the requirements off your list one by one as they are satisfied. It is also critically important to establish early partnerships with local community leaders and businesses to assist in overcoming logistical issues. Reaching out to local officials, landowners, commercial importers, industrial shops, and other industry leaders early on will be to your benefit.
Determining the availability of skilled labor in a remote region is difficult. It is critical that you understand what labor resources are locally available by reviewing recent labor market surveys, collaborating with local governments, and determining the timing of other regional construction projects utilizing the available skilled labor. If your company does not have a local presence, you may likely be required to use an employer of record (EOR). This is a fairly common practice and the EOR will find and employ the workers for you, who will, in turn, perform the work on your project. While this arrangement has its pros and cons, it is a good way to identify the necessary skilled workforce.
Another option might be to identify and directly contract with key individuals as local labor laws allow. This may be the preferable manner to fill the more critical management positions. Another viable option in areas closely aligned with the U.S. is the use of the H2B visa program. This visa allows you to bring in foreign national employees for one year, which can be extended to up to three years, and upon the end of the visa, the employee returns home. The key to success is to understand the labor market early on.
Effective communication is a significant concern on remote jobsites. Much of the workforce will likely be international and speak limited English. You will often find at the conclusion of meetings the assumption is that everyone is on the same page, only to discover shortly thereafter that is not the case. There are several ways to mitigate language barriers, including targeting fluent bilingual project employees as part of your management team. They can bridge the communication barrier and advise the team on cultural gaps that may arise. This person would listen to the “chatter” and help align the team during meetings and while in the field.
Written follow-up is also key to ensure effective communication. Sketches, marked-up drawings, and memos are more clearly understood over verbal communication. Strive to meet in person as much as possible to enhance your confidence that the message is clearly received. Video conferencing works well if an in-person meeting is not possible, but meeting face-to-face to read the room is preferable.
Lead times can depend on how remote or austere the project site is. Assuming early planning may not include a site visit, internet research and reaching out to local vendors is a must. If the work is on an island, you can also assume that most materials will need to be barged in, including the initial cranes, lifts, and all weight-handling equipment required to offload the barge. Compounding the long lead time concern is if the contract requires that materials and equipment be produced in the U.S. This could add months to the delivery and increase contract costs considerably.
Loss of materials en route, whether by misplacement, theft, or falling overboard in foul weather, can be a reality. Overbudgeting on low-cost/pilferable items, within reason, should be considered. One should plan for at least an initial 4-6 month lead time for any project requiring materials from the United States west coast to anywhere remote in the Pacific Ocean.
Delivery of a quality product consistent with U.S. or western standards is challenging on most remote projects. Quality standards need to be established early on in each phase of work, but prior to that design, product selection, and ensuring the delivery of approved materials is critical to a successful quality management program. If the materials must be US-produced, this will help ensure in general higher quality of products are being used, but it will certainly add time and money to the project. If products need not be produced in the US, the designer of record should be particularly careful about what is specified and how liberal they will be on product substitutions. Specifications must be written in consultation with the owner as selections will create considerable swings in pricing.
QA/QC personnel should also be thoroughly versed in the type of work being contemplated. Ensure there is enough coverage to oversee production and that key elements of work are formally inspected and documented. Another quality consideration must be material and equipment storage. Remote locations will inevitably see building materials sit on site for many weeks or months before use. Drywall, ductwork, rebar, steel, pumps, motors, HVAC equipment, transformers, and almost all other building materials are susceptible to weather-related deterioration (corrosion, mold, saturation). While this concern is universal to all projects, it is compounded in remote locations due to the poor quality of the storage facilities available, if any, and the exposure to the elements. Routine rain showers, corrosive salty climates, and hurricane-force winds can compromise most building materials if they sit too long, and all of this leads to the potential of installing defective materials.
In remote locations, the simplest of issues that arise on all construction projects will surely be compounded and much more impactful if not anticipated ahead of time:
There are many technologies in the industry today that assist in overcoming the obstacles associated with remote construction sites. However, they may be limited by bandwidth and other connectivity-related factors common to remote locations. A company must also be confident when contemplating new technology that it is not too advanced for the on-site team to make the return on investment worthwhile. Rolling out a technology that the intended users have never worked with before and expecting them to fully understand the system with just a superficial training session would likely not be a useful expenditure of resources. Some more traditional strategies that should be considered include:
Working in remote locations requires a mix of practical thinking, innovation, and strong community connections. Each project has its unique challenges, but a combination of careful planning and nimbleness are important components—from ensuring materials arrive on time to meeting quality standards to dealing with site security issues. A team’s experience and local knowledge make a big difference, helping to make the most of limited resources and to tackle the unique issues of remote sites.
Comments